#Octave vs matlab code#

#Octave vs matlab code#

Meaning - code anycodings_matlab written in Octave often does not work in anycodings_matlab MATLAB without numerous conversions. How this is anycodings_matlab better, I really don't see.Īlso, if you learn Octave, there's a lot anycodings_matlab of syntax allowed in Octave that's not anycodings_matlab allowed in MATLAB. In anycodings_matlab my experience, running stuff developed anycodings_matlab in MATLAB doesn't ever work in one go, anycodings_matlab except for the really simple, really anycodings_matlab short stuff - For any sizable function, anycodings_matlab I always have to translate a lot of anycodings_matlab stuff before it works in Octave, if not anycodings_matlab re-write it from scratch. If it anycodings_matlab tries to be 'better', it thus tries to anycodings_matlab be different, which is not in line with anycodings_matlab the reasons most people use it for.

The idea behind anycodings_matlab Octave is (or has become, I should say, anycodings_matlab see comments below) to have an open anycodings_matlab source alternative to run m-code. This attitude makes Octave lose its anycodings_matlab purpose completely. This shows that anycodings_matlab Octave's developers try to make Octave anycodings_matlab syntax 'superior' to MATLAB's.

If you read carefully the wiki page you anycodings_matlab provide, you'll often see sentences like anycodings_matlab 'Octave supports both, while MATLAB anycodings_matlab requires the first' etc. Rather than provide you with a complete anycodings_matlab list of differences, I'll give you my anycodings_matlab view on the matter.